The Inquiring Organization:
How organizations acquire knowledge and seek information
A monograph by Chun Wei Choo, published by Oxford University Press in January 2016. For a detailed description, see the book's OUP page or read the full text online in Oxford Scholarship Online.
Reviews and endorsements
The book is reviewed in Information Research by Prof. Elena Maceviciute of the University of Borås. For a practitioner perspective, see the blog posts by Martin White in CMS Wire and Intranet Focus.
"One more time, Professor Choo offers a unique and ground breaking analysis of the nature of human organization and information behaviour. Mastering more than ever the art of weaving concepts, theories and models from various disciplines into a fascinating text, Choo provides a completely innovative discussion aimed at understanding how and why organizations acquire knowledge, and seek and use information. The book should become indispensable and a must-read for anyone seriously interested in studying organizations in the age of the Internet. It brings a totally new and much-needed modern perspective of organizations that will challenge well-established approaches in organizational theory and information science." France Bouthillier, Associate Dean, Graduate and Postdoctoral Studies, McGill University
"Choo's The Inquiring Organization is a monumental achievement. This book should be required reading in fields such as organizational behavior, library and information science, organizational communication, knowledge management, and information systems." Ronald E. Rice, Arthur N. Rupe Professor in the Social Effects of Mass Communication, University of California, Santa Barbara
"Chun Wei Choo's new book is a well-grounded theoretical text that will also benefit the organizational practices of information management and use. The Inquiring Organization will be an essential text for any teaching programme in information management and for courses on organizational information behaviour, but it should also be read by any organizational manager concerned with ensuring that organizational decisions at any level are well-founded." T.D. Wilson, Senior Professor, University of Borås, Sweden
"In The Inquiring Organization, Choo raises the critical question of how information is transformed into knowledge to support organizational learning. The book brings together theories of information and organizational behavior with pragmatic, social, and value-driven information-seeking and knowledge acquisition to provide a comprehensive framework for understanding and improving inquiring organizations. This important book comes at a critical time in the development of organizational theory and is highly recommended for those concerned with organizational sense-making, knowledge creation, and decision making." Carol C. Kuhlthau, Professor Emerita, Department of Library and Information Science, Rutgers University
"A remarkable achievement and enjoyable reading for scholars in organizational communication, knowledge management, information systems, and organizational behavior." International Journal of Communication
"The amount of intellectual effort put into the book is remarkable...I am quite sure that many young and senior researchers may find a way out of a creative block that many of us run into from time to time or a brilliant idea for a project while reading this monograph." Information Research
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Chapter 1. Knowledge and information in organizational learning: An introduction
Towards a normative view of organizational knowing
Scope and objective of the book
Overview of book chapters
Coda
PART ONE: ORGANIZATIONAL EPISTEMOLOGY
Chapter 2. Justifying belief: The pyramid, the raft, and the crossword puzzle
Standard view of knowledge as justified true belief
Foundationalism
Foundationalism and organizational learning
Coherentism
Coherentism and organizational learning
The pyramid and the raft
A third metaphor: The crossword puzzle
Synthesis
Chapter 3. Pragmatist views of knowledge: Knowledge as communal inquiry
Knowledge as process of inquiry
Theory of knowledge as theory of inquiry
Community of Inquiry
Hull-House Settlement as community of inquiry
WHO Smallpox Eradication Program as community of inquiry
Pragmatism and organizational learning
Synthesis
Chapter 4. Social epistemology: Learning from other people
Evolution of social epistemology
Testimonial knowledge
Trust and testimony
Learning from experts
Peer disagreement
Collective agents and collective beliefs
Institutional or systems-oriented epistemology
Social epistemology and organizational learning
Social epistemology and knowledge management: The Eureka project at Xerox
Coda
Chapter 5. Epistemic virtues and vices
Virtue epistemology
Epistemic virtues, organizational learning, and information seeking
Epistemic vices in organizational learning
The social production of knowledge
Summary
PART TWO: ORGANIZATIONAL INFORMATION BEHAVIOR
Chapter 6. Models of information behavior
Information behavior
Information needs
Information seeking
Information use
Kuhlthau’s information search process model
Dervin’s sense-making metaphor
Wilson’s information behavior model
Coda
Chapter 7. Information in organizations
Information challenges in organizations
Information needs in organizations
Information seeking in organizations
Information use in organizations
Integrative model of organizational information behavior
Information culture of organizations
Coda
Chapter 8. Internet epistemology
The Internet and its epistemic consequences
Epistemology of search engines
Epistemology of Wikipedia
Epistemology of blogs
Epistemology of big data
Anonymity on the Internet and its epistemic effects
Epistemic virtues in the age of the Internet
Social production of knowledge in online communities
Coda
Chapter 9. The inquiring organization
The inquiring organization as epistemic organization
How organizations form beliefs
Knowledge through action and inquiry
Knowledge from other people
Virtuous knowledge acquisition
Epistemic curiosity
Seeking information on the Internet
Information behavior of organizations
Knowledge and action are the central relations between mind and world.
In action, world is adapted to mind.
In knowledge, mind is adapted to world.
When world is maladapted to mind, there is a residue of desire.
When mind is maladapted to world, there is a residue of belief.
Desire aspires to action; belief aspires to knowledge.
The point of desire is action; the point of belief is knowledge.
-- Timothy Williamson, Knowledge and Its Limits, 2000, p. 1